Formats and tools
- Unit Description
- Reconstruct the unit from the xml and display it as an HTML page.
- Assessment Tool
- an assessor resource that builds a framework for writing an assessment tool
- Assessment Template
- generate a spreadsheet for marking this unit in a classroom environment. Put student names in the top row and check them off as they demonstrate competenece for each of the unit's elements and performance criteria.
- Assessment Matrix
- a slightly different format than the assessment template. A spreadsheet with unit names, elements and performance criteria in separate columns. Put assessment names in column headings to track which performance criteria each one covers. Good for ensuring that you've covered every one of the performance criteria with your assessment instrument (all assessement tools together).
- Wiki Markup
- mark up the unit in a wiki markup codes, ready to copy and paste into a wiki page. The output will work in most wikis but is designed to work particularly well as a Wikiversity learning project.
- Evidence Guide
- create an evidence guide for workplace assessment and RPL applicants
- Competency Mapping Template
- Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners. A template for developing assessments for a unit, which will help you to create valid, fair and reliable assessments for the unit, ready to give to trainers and students
- Observation Checklist
- create an observation checklist for workplace assessment and RPL applicants. This is similar to the evidence guide above, but a little shorter and friendlier on your printer. You will also need to create a seperate Assessor Marking Guide for guidelines on gathering evidence and a list of key points for each activity observed using the unit's range statement, required skills and evidence required (see the unit's html page for details)
- Self Assessment Survey
- A form for students to assess thier current skill levels against each of the unit's performance criteria. Cut and paste into a web document or print and distribute in hard copy.
- Moodle Outcomes
- Create a csv file of the unit's performance criteria to import into a moodle course as outcomes, ready to associate with each of your assignments. Here's a quick 'how to' for importing these into moodle 2.x
- Registered Training Organisations
- Trying to find someone to train or assess you? This link lists all the RTOs that are currently registered to deliver CPPACC5007A, 'Apply mechanics of human body functions to accessible building design and fitout'.
- Google Links
- links to google searches, with filtering in place to maximise the usefulness of the returned results
- Books
- Reference books for 'Apply mechanics of human body functions to accessible building design and fitout' on fishpond.com.au. This online store has a huge range of books, pretty reasonable prices, free delivery in Australia *and* they give a small commission to ntisthis.com for every purchase, so go nuts :)
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT | PERFORMANCE CRITERIA | ||
1Determine the level of impairment in human anatomy and body function within a defined population. | 1.1 Key functional systems of the human body are identified accurately. 1.2 Appropriate terminology for describing impairment of key body functions is selected and applied. 1.3 The relationship between impairment, disability and handicap is recognised. 1.4 Extent of impairment in a defined population is recorded in a recognised format for retrieval and statistical analysis in accordance with organisational requirements. | ||
2Analyse the impact of anatomical and functional impairment of the musculoskeletal system on the mobility needs of a defined population, and the consequences for accessible design. | 2.1 Published accessibility design data for mobility is assessed against anatomical and functional impairment data for its ability to meet the mobility needs of the defined population. 2.2 Data on anatomical and functional impairment of the musculoskeletal system for a defined population is compared with published accessibility design data to identify any differences in mobility needs and the extent of those differences. | ||
2.3 Possible causes for the difference between the defined population and the published accessibility design data are identified, and the likely consequences of altering published accessibility design data are assessed. | |||
3Analyse the impact of anatomical and functional impairment of the eye and vision system on the wayfinding needs of a defined population and the consequences for accessible design. | 3.1 Published accessibility design data for wayfinding is assessed against anatomical and functional impairment of the eye and vision system data for its ability to meet the wayfinding needs of the defined population. 3.2 Data on anatomical and functional impairment of the eye and vision system for a defined population is compared with published accessibility design data to identify any differences in mobility needs and the extent of those differences. 3.3 Possible causes for the difference between the defined population and the published accessibility design data are identified, and the likely consequences of altering published accessibility design data are assessed. | ||
4Analyse the impact of anatomical and functional impairment of the ear and auditory system on the communication needs of a defined population and the consequences for accessible design. | 4.1 Published accessibility design data for communication is assessed against anatomical and functional impairment of the ear and auditory system data for its ability to meet the communication needs of the defined population. 4.2 Data on anatomical and functional impairment of the ear and auditory system for a defined population is compared with published accessibility design data to identify any differences in mobility needs and the extent of those differences. 4.3 Possible causes for the difference between the defined population and the published accessibility design data are identified, and the likely consequences of altering published accessibility design data are assessed. | ||