Formats and tools
- Unit Description
- Reconstruct the unit from the xml and display it as an HTML page.
- Assessment Tool
- an assessor resource that builds a framework for writing an assessment tool
- Assessment Template
- generate a spreadsheet for marking this unit in a classroom environment. Put student names in the top row and check them off as they demonstrate competenece for each of the unit's elements and performance criteria.
- Assessment Matrix
- a slightly different format than the assessment template. A spreadsheet with unit names, elements and performance criteria in separate columns. Put assessment names in column headings to track which performance criteria each one covers. Good for ensuring that you've covered every one of the performance criteria with your assessment instrument (all assessement tools together).
- Wiki Markup
- mark up the unit in a wiki markup codes, ready to copy and paste into a wiki page. The output will work in most wikis but is designed to work particularly well as a Wikiversity learning project.
- Evidence Guide
- create an evidence guide for workplace assessment and RPL applicants
- Competency Mapping Template
- Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners. A template for developing assessments for a unit, which will help you to create valid, fair and reliable assessments for the unit, ready to give to trainers and students
- Observation Checklist
- create an observation checklist for workplace assessment and RPL applicants. This is similar to the evidence guide above, but a little shorter and friendlier on your printer. You will also need to create a seperate Assessor Marking Guide for guidelines on gathering evidence and a list of key points for each activity observed using the unit's range statement, required skills and evidence required (see the unit's html page for details)
- Self Assessment Survey
- A form for students to assess thier current skill levels against each of the unit's performance criteria. Cut and paste into a web document or print and distribute in hard copy.
- Moodle Outcomes
- Create a csv file of the unit's performance criteria to import into a moodle course as outcomes, ready to associate with each of your assignments. Here's a quick 'how to' for importing these into moodle 2.x
- Registered Training Organisations
- Trying to find someone to train or assess you? This link lists all the RTOs that are currently registered to deliver ICAA5046B, 'Model preferred system solutions'.
- Google Links
- links to google searches, with filtering in place to maximise the usefulness of the returned results
- Reference books for 'Model preferred system solutions' on fishpond.com.au. This online store has a huge range of books, pretty reasonable prices, free delivery in Australia *and* they give a small commission to ntisthis.com for every purchase, so go nuts :)
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Review and confirm requirements information and existing models
1.1. Review requirements information and clarify areas that are not understood
1.2. Identify organisational standards for developing models, and check the model development method for consistency with organisational goals
1.3. Identify assumptions and incorporate into modelling process
1.4. Identify goals and resolve into tasks required to be performed to obtain the goals
1.5. Define internal tasks needed to perform identified goals
2. Resolve conflicts and inconsistencies
2.1. Identify missed opportunities arising from previous and current model development
2.2. Identify bottlenecks, overlooked functionalities and other issues and resolve with client input as required
3. Build and test model
3.1. Develop model based on existing architecture
3.2. Document details of model according to agreed project or organisational standards
3.3. Develop model according to project deliverables and acceptance criteria and within a determined timeframe and project constraints
3.4. Test model against the test plan
3.5. Document test data to ensure test procedures accurately and thoroughly validate performance of model
4. Ensure that the model represents a workable solution
4.1. Ensure a consensus view of key IT stakeholders is represented in the model
4.2. Ensure the model is checked by key IT stakeholders to confirm common understanding of the model and the proposed solution
4.3. Submit the model to appropriate person for sign-off