Formats and tools
- Unit Description
- Reconstruct the unit from the xml and display it as an HTML page.
- Assessment Tool
- an assessor resource that builds a framework for writing an assessment tool
- Assessment Template
- generate a spreadsheet for marking this unit in a classroom environment. Put student names in the top row and check them off as they demonstrate competenece for each of the unit's elements and performance criteria.
- Assessment Matrix
- a slightly different format than the assessment template. A spreadsheet with unit names, elements and performance criteria in separate columns. Put assessment names in column headings to track which performance criteria each one covers. Good for ensuring that you've covered every one of the performance criteria with your assessment instrument (all assessement tools together).
- Wiki Markup
- mark up the unit in a wiki markup codes, ready to copy and paste into a wiki page. The output will work in most wikis but is designed to work particularly well as a Wikiversity learning project.
- Evidence Guide
- create an evidence guide for workplace assessment and RPL applicants
- Competency Mapping Template
- Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners. A template for developing assessments for a unit, which will help you to create valid, fair and reliable assessments for the unit, ready to give to trainers and students
- Observation Checklist
- create an observation checklist for workplace assessment and RPL applicants. This is similar to the evidence guide above, but a little shorter and friendlier on your printer. You will also need to create a seperate Assessor Marking Guide for guidelines on gathering evidence and a list of key points for each activity observed using the unit's range statement, required skills and evidence required (see the unit's html page for details)
- Self Assessment Survey
- A form for students to assess thier current skill levels against each of the unit's performance criteria. Cut and paste into a web document or print and distribute in hard copy.
- Moodle Outcomes
- Create a csv file of the unit's performance criteria to import into a moodle course as outcomes, ready to associate with each of your assignments. Here's a quick 'how to' for importing these into moodle 2.x
- Registered Training Organisations
- Trying to find someone to train or assess you? This link lists all the RTOs that are currently registered to deliver LGAGOVA610B, 'Implement computerised asset management systems'.
- Google Links
- links to google searches, with filtering in place to maximise the usefulness of the returned results
- Reference books for 'Implement computerised asset management systems' on fishpond.com.au. This online store has a huge range of books, pretty reasonable prices, free delivery in Australia *and* they give a small commission to ntisthis.com for every purchase, so go nuts :)
Elements and Performance Criteria
1 Determine appropriate information systems to support the asset management strategy
1.1 The requirements of the asset maintenance system are established with key stakeholders.
1.2 Asset maintenance strategy is developed consistent with legal and council requirements.
1.3 Information and communication strategy is developed.
1.4 Future need for integration of system modules to cater for finance, administration and technical management aspects is identified.
1.5 Migration strategy is determined in accordance with the degree of system complexity to enable modification or updating of existing systems to suit the organisation's needs.
1.6 Migration strategy includes detailed action plan and implementation program prioritised on cost/benefit and addresses implementation and maintenance parameters.
2 Assess software in consultation with relevant personnel
2.1 Needs analysis of current and future activities is undertaken to determine essential and desirable outputs of system.
2.2 Comparison system for evaluating software packages is developed to reflect requirements of asset management system.
2.3 Software packages are investigated and evaluated against functionality requirements in consultation with relevant personnel.
2.4 Specific enhancements required to tailor software packages to council needs are determined and discussed with software providers.
2.5 Software packages are compared and demonstrations are arranged to allow the most informed decision.
2.6 Optimum software is selected based on the ability to deliver identified functionalities.