Formats and tools
- Unit Description
- Reconstruct the unit from the xml and display it as an HTML page.
- Assessment Tool
- an assessor resource that builds a framework for writing an assessment tool
- Assessment Template
- generate a spreadsheet for marking this unit in a classroom environment. Put student names in the top row and check them off as they demonstrate competenece for each of the unit's elements and performance criteria.
- Assessment Matrix
- a slightly different format than the assessment template. A spreadsheet with unit names, elements and performance criteria in separate columns. Put assessment names in column headings to track which performance criteria each one covers. Good for ensuring that you've covered every one of the performance criteria with your assessment instrument (all assessement tools together).
- Wiki Markup
- mark up the unit in a wiki markup codes, ready to copy and paste into a wiki page. The output will work in most wikis but is designed to work particularly well as a Wikiversity learning project.
- Evidence Guide
- create an evidence guide for workplace assessment and RPL applicants
- Competency Mapping Template
- Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners. A template for developing assessments for a unit, which will help you to create valid, fair and reliable assessments for the unit, ready to give to trainers and students
- Observation Checklist
- create an observation checklist for workplace assessment and RPL applicants. This is similar to the evidence guide above, but a little shorter and friendlier on your printer. You will also need to create a seperate Assessor Marking Guide for guidelines on gathering evidence and a list of key points for each activity observed using the unit's range statement, required skills and evidence required (see the unit's html page for details)
- Self Assessment Survey
- A form for students to assess thier current skill levels against each of the unit's performance criteria. Cut and paste into a web document or print and distribute in hard copy.
- Moodle Outcomes
- Create a csv file of the unit's performance criteria to import into a moodle course as outcomes, ready to associate with each of your assignments. Here's a quick 'how to' for importing these into moodle 2.x
- Registered Training Organisations
- Trying to find someone to train or assess you? This link lists all the RTOs that are currently registered to deliver LMFFDT6005A, 'Work collaboratively on a design project'.
- Google Links
- links to google searches, with filtering in place to maximise the usefulness of the returned results
- Books
- Reference books for 'Work collaboratively on a design project' on fishpond.com.au. This online store has a huge range of books, pretty reasonable prices, free delivery in Australia *and* they give a small commission to ntisthis.com for every purchase, so go nuts :)
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT | PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
1. Plan for project collaboration | 1.1. Applicable OHS, legislative and organisational requirements relevant to collaborating on a design project are verified and complied with 1.2. Project requirement are agreed with client, confirmed and clarified 1.3. Communication with others is established and maintained with all involved in the design process 1.4. Potential collaborators are scrutinised and confirmed based on displayed expertise potential 1.5. End users and other interested parties are involved in the collaboration |
2. Work collaboratively on projects | 2.1. Methods of collaboration are negotiated and followed 2.2. Project objectives are researched, a design brief developed and instigated 2.3. Ideas for concept development are shared and worked through 2.4. Concepts are critiqued and final outcomes agreed upon in accordance with the elements of design and principles of design 2.5. Management systems are set in place, plan developed and quality control measures adopted for the project 2.6. Type and quantity of material to be used is debated, agreed and obtained 2.7. Equipment requirements are debated and selected appropriate to project requirements 2.8. Project manufacturing procedures are debated and final manufacturing processes agreed including assembly techniques and finishing methods 2.9. Distribution channels, marketing and despatch strategies are debated and instigated 2.10. Final presentation of the project is made displaying respect for all collaborators |
3. Evaluate design collaboration project | 3.1. Quality systems are evaluated for effectiveness of outcomes 3.2. Client satisfaction with the project outcome is measured 3.3. Observations from collaborators on improvement of the process is collected 3.4. Collaborators are assessed and reviewed for their effectiveness in the process 3.5. Systems are analysed for improvement opportunities |