Formats and tools
- Unit Description
- Reconstruct the unit from the xml and display it as an HTML page.
- Assessment Tool
- an assessor resource that builds a framework for writing an assessment tool
- Assessment Template
- generate a spreadsheet for marking this unit in a classroom environment. Put student names in the top row and check them off as they demonstrate competenece for each of the unit's elements and performance criteria.
- Assessment Matrix
- a slightly different format than the assessment template. A spreadsheet with unit names, elements and performance criteria in separate columns. Put assessment names in column headings to track which performance criteria each one covers. Good for ensuring that you've covered every one of the performance criteria with your assessment instrument (all assessement tools together).
- Wiki Markup
- mark up the unit in a wiki markup codes, ready to copy and paste into a wiki page. The output will work in most wikis but is designed to work particularly well as a Wikiversity learning project.
- Evidence Guide
- create an evidence guide for workplace assessment and RPL applicants
- Competency Mapping Template
- Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners. A template for developing assessments for a unit, which will help you to create valid, fair and reliable assessments for the unit, ready to give to trainers and students
- Observation Checklist
- create an observation checklist for workplace assessment and RPL applicants. This is similar to the evidence guide above, but a little shorter and friendlier on your printer. You will also need to create a seperate Assessor Marking Guide for guidelines on gathering evidence and a list of key points for each activity observed using the unit's range statement, required skills and evidence required (see the unit's html page for details)
- Self Assessment Survey
- A form for students to assess thier current skill levels against each of the unit's performance criteria. Cut and paste into a web document or print and distribute in hard copy.
- Moodle Outcomes
- Create a csv file of the unit's performance criteria to import into a moodle course as outcomes, ready to associate with each of your assignments. Here's a quick 'how to' for importing these into moodle 2.x
- Registered Training Organisations
- Trying to find someone to train or assess you? This link lists all the RTOs that are currently registered to deliver LMFID6008A, 'Evaluate design project outcomes'.
- Google Links
- links to google searches, with filtering in place to maximise the usefulness of the returned results
- Books
- Reference books for 'Evaluate design project outcomes' on fishpond.com.au. This online store has a huge range of books, pretty reasonable prices, free delivery in Australia *and* they give a small commission to ntisthis.com for every purchase, so go nuts :)
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT | PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
1. Identify evaluation criteria | 1.1. Project brief is analysed to determine key design requirements 1.2. Problems or underlying factors to be addressed by the project brief are verified 1.3. Communication requirements are identified for the project 1.4. Current industry design trends relating to project brief are researched and identified 1.5. Workplace and industry standards in relation to design presentation are researched and identified 1.6. Quality criteria that apply to design processes are researched and identified 1.7. Evaluation criteria are identified |
2. Apply evaluation criteria | 2.1. Drawings, mood boards and all associated documentation is examined to identify all features of the finished design 2.2. Finished design is evaluated against original design concept 2.3. The design and all specifications are evaluated against project brief to check consistency 2.4. The design is evaluated to identify how well elements and principles of design have been applied 2.5. The design is evaluated for consistency with current industry trends and influences 2.6. The design is evaluated to ensure client suitability including adherence to time and budget requirements 2.7. The design is evaluated for quality and innovative elements 2.8. Processes engaged to develop finished design are evaluated for effectiveness in achieving final outcomes |
3. Suggest design improvements | 3.1. Factors affecting the outcome of the project are examined and documented 3.2. Suggestions are made for adjustments to design to increase its ability to meet criteria 3.3. Technical design skills are used to reflect evaluation outcomes and communicate improvements 3.4. Potential design improvements are identified and tested for viability 3.5. Selection, adaptation and introduction of materials, tools, technology and design processes are applied to design improvements 3.6. Compliance with intellectual and copyright requirements is observed when incorporating ideas from others 3.7. Evaluation report is compiled and produced |