Formats and tools
- Unit Description
- Reconstruct the unit from the xml and display it as an HTML page.
- Assessment Tool
- an assessor resource that builds a framework for writing an assessment tool
- Assessment Template
- generate a spreadsheet for marking this unit in a classroom environment. Put student names in the top row and check them off as they demonstrate competenece for each of the unit's elements and performance criteria.
- Assessment Matrix
- a slightly different format than the assessment template. A spreadsheet with unit names, elements and performance criteria in separate columns. Put assessment names in column headings to track which performance criteria each one covers. Good for ensuring that you've covered every one of the performance criteria with your assessment instrument (all assessement tools together).
- Wiki Markup
- mark up the unit in a wiki markup codes, ready to copy and paste into a wiki page. The output will work in most wikis but is designed to work particularly well as a Wikiversity learning project.
- Evidence Guide
- create an evidence guide for workplace assessment and RPL applicants
- Competency Mapping Template
- Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners. A template for developing assessments for a unit, which will help you to create valid, fair and reliable assessments for the unit, ready to give to trainers and students
- Observation Checklist
- create an observation checklist for workplace assessment and RPL applicants. This is similar to the evidence guide above, but a little shorter and friendlier on your printer. You will also need to create a seperate Assessor Marking Guide for guidelines on gathering evidence and a list of key points for each activity observed using the unit's range statement, required skills and evidence required (see the unit's html page for details)
- Self Assessment Survey
- A form for students to assess thier current skill levels against each of the unit's performance criteria. Cut and paste into a web document or print and distribute in hard copy.
- Moodle Outcomes
- Create a csv file of the unit's performance criteria to import into a moodle course as outcomes, ready to associate with each of your assignments. Here's a quick 'how to' for importing these into moodle 2.x
- Registered Training Organisations
- Trying to find someone to train or assess you? This link lists all the RTOs that are currently registered to deliver PSPFRAU505B, 'Develop fraud control plans'.
- Google Links
- links to google searches, with filtering in place to maximise the usefulness of the returned results
- Reference books for 'Develop fraud control plans' on fishpond.com.au. This online store has a huge range of books, pretty reasonable prices, free delivery in Australia *and* they give a small commission to ntisthis.com for every purchase, so go nuts :)
Elements and Performance Criteria
1. Identify areas for action
1.1 Processes are established to identify fraud and corruption risks and vulnerability.
1.2 Areas are identified for action through the fraud/corruption risk assessment process or some other process for identifying fraud and corruption vulnerability.
1.3 Initiatives are developed in consultation with appropriate staff to control identified vulnerabilities.
1.4 Areas within the organisation responsible for fraud and corruption minimisation actions are identified.
1.5 Consultation with stakeholders is undertaken to develop a shared understanding of responsibilities.
1.6 Timeframe for implementation of actions is specified based upon an understanding of the nature of risk and resource ramifications.
2. Gain commitment to fraud/corruption control plan
2.1 Professional development awareness and information programs are initiated in consultation with responsible staff.
2.2 Fraud/corruption prevention initiatives are tailored to the organisational culture, core business and client groups.
3. Identify qualitative and quantitative performance indicators
3.1 Advice is sought from internal and external specialist personnel.
3.2 Stakeholders are involved in the development of performance indicators.
3.3 Performance indicators are developed that relate to the objectives of the program and enable an assessment of the extent to which fraud and corruption control objectives are being achieved.
3.4 Feedback mechanisms are established to ensure that performance data informs improvements to fraud/corruption control strategies and activities.
4. Document fraud/corruption control plan
4.1 Control plan is documented using concise language and structure tailored to the intended audience/s.
4.2 The responsibilities for fraud and corruption control of each area in the organisation are clearly articulated in the plan.
4.3 Risks targeted by the risk assessment process are used to identify areas for action.
4.4 A comprehensive fraud/corruption control strategy for the organisation is reflected in the plan.
4.5 The plan is linked to internal audit to reduce overlap or duplication.
4.6 The requirements of any jurisdictional fraud and corruption control legislation and guidelines are addressed in the plan.
5. Disseminate fraud/corruption control plan
5.1 Non-confidential components of the fraud/corruption control plan are made accessible to staff, the Minister and clients of the organisation.
5.2 Confidential components are documented and stored appropriately.
5.3 Review of the plan is conducted in accordance with organisational and jurisdictional needs and requirements.