Formats and tools
- Unit Description
- Reconstruct the unit from the xml and display it as an HTML page.
- Assessment Tool
- an assessor resource that builds a framework for writing an assessment tool
- Assessment Template
- generate a spreadsheet for marking this unit in a classroom environment. Put student names in the top row and check them off as they demonstrate competenece for each of the unit's elements and performance criteria.
- Assessment Matrix
- a slightly different format than the assessment template. A spreadsheet with unit names, elements and performance criteria in separate columns. Put assessment names in column headings to track which performance criteria each one covers. Good for ensuring that you've covered every one of the performance criteria with your assessment instrument (all assessement tools together).
- Wiki Markup
- mark up the unit in a wiki markup codes, ready to copy and paste into a wiki page. The output will work in most wikis but is designed to work particularly well as a Wikiversity learning project.
- Evidence Guide
- create an evidence guide for workplace assessment and RPL applicants
- Competency Mapping Template
- Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners. A template for developing assessments for a unit, which will help you to create valid, fair and reliable assessments for the unit, ready to give to trainers and students
- Observation Checklist
- create an observation checklist for workplace assessment and RPL applicants. This is similar to the evidence guide above, but a little shorter and friendlier on your printer. You will also need to create a seperate Assessor Marking Guide for guidelines on gathering evidence and a list of key points for each activity observed using the unit's range statement, required skills and evidence required (see the unit's html page for details)
- Self Assessment Survey
- A form for students to assess thier current skill levels against each of the unit's performance criteria. Cut and paste into a web document or print and distribute in hard copy.
- Moodle Outcomes
- Create a csv file of the unit's performance criteria to import into a moodle course as outcomes, ready to associate with each of your assignments. Here's a quick 'how to' for importing these into moodle 2.x
- Registered Training Organisations
- Trying to find someone to train or assess you? This link lists all the RTOs that are currently registered to deliver PSPFRAU602B, 'Manage fraud risk assessment and action plan'.
- Google Links
- links to google searches, with filtering in place to maximise the usefulness of the returned results
- Books
- Reference books for 'Manage fraud risk assessment and action plan' on fishpond.com.au. This online store has a huge range of books, pretty reasonable prices, free delivery in Australia *and* they give a small commission to ntisthis.com for every purchase, so go nuts :)
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT | PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
1. Apply organisational philosophy regarding risk | 1.1 Stakeholders are consulted in the management of the fraud/corruption risk assessment process. 1.2 Cultural, ethical and economic perspectives of the organisation are acknowledged and applied when making decisions regarding the development and implementation of the risk assessment process in the organisation. |
2. Select risk assessment methodology | 2.1 Selection of risk assessment methodology is based on an evaluation of a range of fraud/corruption risk management techniques, and factors such as the environment, culture and functions of the organisation. 2.2 Methodology is selected to meet the Australian standard for risk management, is compatible with the organisation's environment, culture, structure and core business and is able to be applied across all the organisation's programs and services. 2.3 Activities of personnel implementing the fraud/corruption risk assessment methodology are monitored in accordance with organisational policy and procedures. |
3. Establish reporting and review mechanisms | 3.1 The identification of appropriate actions to be implemented is included in reporting mechanisms. 3.2 Review mechanisms are established that acknowledge the need for flexibility and the ongoing nature of the fraud/corruption risk assessment process. 3.3 Reporting mechanisms are established to allow for advice to be provided at opportune times to facilitate a flexible response by management to any deficiencies identified. 3.4 Reporting mechanisms are established to meet the requirements of standards-setting organisations. |