Formats and tools
- Unit Description
- Reconstruct the unit from the xml and display it as an HTML page.
- Assessment Tool
- an assessor resource that builds a framework for writing an assessment tool
- Assessment Template
- generate a spreadsheet for marking this unit in a classroom environment. Put student names in the top row and check them off as they demonstrate competenece for each of the unit's elements and performance criteria.
- Assessment Matrix
- a slightly different format than the assessment template. A spreadsheet with unit names, elements and performance criteria in separate columns. Put assessment names in column headings to track which performance criteria each one covers. Good for ensuring that you've covered every one of the performance criteria with your assessment instrument (all assessement tools together).
- Wiki Markup
- mark up the unit in a wiki markup codes, ready to copy and paste into a wiki page. The output will work in most wikis but is designed to work particularly well as a Wikiversity learning project.
- Evidence Guide
- create an evidence guide for workplace assessment and RPL applicants
- Competency Mapping Template
- Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners. A template for developing assessments for a unit, which will help you to create valid, fair and reliable assessments for the unit, ready to give to trainers and students
- Observation Checklist
- create an observation checklist for workplace assessment and RPL applicants. This is similar to the evidence guide above, but a little shorter and friendlier on your printer. You will also need to create a seperate Assessor Marking Guide for guidelines on gathering evidence and a list of key points for each activity observed using the unit's range statement, required skills and evidence required (see the unit's html page for details)
- Self Assessment Survey
- A form for students to assess thier current skill levels against each of the unit's performance criteria. Cut and paste into a web document or print and distribute in hard copy.
- Moodle Outcomes
- Create a csv file of the unit's performance criteria to import into a moodle course as outcomes, ready to associate with each of your assignments. Here's a quick 'how to' for importing these into moodle 2.x
- Registered Training Organisations
- Trying to find someone to train or assess you? This link lists all the RTOs that are currently registered to deliver PUAEMR013B, 'Facilitate treatment strategy development and implementation'.
- Google Links
- links to google searches, with filtering in place to maximise the usefulness of the returned results
- Books
- Reference books for 'Facilitate treatment strategy development and implementation' on fishpond.com.au. This online store has a huge range of books, pretty reasonable prices, free delivery in Australia *and* they give a small commission to ntisthis.com for every purchase, so go nuts :)
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT | PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
1. Confirm project context | 1.1 Project drivers/triggers, risks, risk management context, treatment options and priorities and practical constraints are clarified 1.2 Applicable legislative/regulatory and organisational requirements, policies, procedures and relevant emergency management arrangements are identified 1.3 Key stakeholders are identified along with their potential interests, sensitivities, roles and responsibilities 1.4 Project brief is developed and refined with key stakeholders |
2. Establish project process | 2.1 Working group is established with an appropriate balance of expertise, representation and authority for the project brief 2.2 Purpose, scope and desired outcomes outlined in the project brief are confirmed with group members 2.3 Project management plan is developed in consultation with the group 2.4 Processes for negotiating outcomes and making decisions are developed within existing accountabilities 2.5 Consultation strategies are developed for effective stakeholder input, commitment and ongoing ownership of outcomes 2.6 Information management, reporting and accountability strategies are developed and agreed |
3. Assess and select treatment strategies | 3.1 Existing risk assessments, current treatment programs and other plans that may impact on the project are identified by group members and analysed for relevance 3.2 Items from the risk register are selected for consideration 3.3 A wide range of alternatives are considered when canvassing possible treatment strategies 3.4 Input from relevant specialists and stakeholders is sought and analysed 3.5 Each treatment strategy is assessed for the ability to reduce risk 3.6 Preferred treatment strategy is selected and the reasons documented 3.7 Broad tactics, roles, tasks, responsibilities, resource implications and timeframe for implementing the selected strategy are documented 3.8 Support is developed by validating the strategy with agency/service providers and other stakeholders |
4. Plan implementation of agreed strategy | 4.1 Treatment strategy is broken down into a logical sequence of manageable and time-related activities 4.2 Ability and responsibility of agencies and service providers to undertake specific activities is jointly assessed 4.3 Accountability for components of the strategy is negotiated and confirmed with the appropriate agency/service provider 4.4 Project risks are assessed and contingencies developed for all key components of the strategy 4.5 Performance criteria are established for monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of the treatment strategy 4.6 An overall implementation plan that identifies key activities, roles and responsibilities, resource requirements, management arrangements and timetable is developed and validated 4.7 Agency implementation strategies are reviewed and refined as necessary |
5. Facilitate treatment strategy implementation | 5.1 Treatment tasks/activities are allocated in accordance with the implementation plan 5.2 Effectiveness of treatment activities, adequacy of resources, project progress and expenditure is monitored against plans and recorded 5.3 Effective communication between working group members is maintained 5.4 Stakeholders are kept fully informed of progress, performance and any proposed variations in strategy or implementation 5.5 Agreed variations to the treatment plan are introduced to accommodate changed circumstances or to achieve more effective outcomes 5.6 Treatment tasks/activities are completed on time and within budget |
6. Establish and maintain productive working relationships | 6.1 Influence and support for the treatment strategy is built by cultivating relationships with key stakeholders 6.2 Clear and accurate information is provided 6.3 Differences of opinion and the views of others are respected 6.4 Negotiations are kept focussed on key issues and moving forward towards resolution 6.5 Conflict is resolved in a timely, constructive manner 6.6 Agreements are adhered to and commitments met |
7. Review treatment strategy implementation | 7.1 Effectiveness of the treatment strategy is evaluated using agreed performance criteria 7.2 Residual risk is identified and decisions made to accept this risk or re-examine treatment strategies 7.3 Planning processes are reviewed to identify opportunities for improvement 7.4 Project reporting requirements are completed 7.5 Outcomes are disseminated to relevant stakeholders |