List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Element | Performance criteria |
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1. Apply knowledge of muscle structure and biochemistry to meat quality and the factors that affect it | 1.1 Explain biological mechanisms (both pre and post slaughter) that affect meat quality in beef 1.2 Identify the pattern of tissue development in the body and the pattern of deposition within the muscle and fat deposits, including the extent to which the composition of fat deposits can be manipulated by production factors 1.3 Identify structure of skeletal muscles in terms of the myofibre and connective tissue components and the effect these structures have on eating quality 1.4 Identify biochemical events that occur in muscle early post-mortem and their significance in subsequent meat quality |
2. Identify production and pre-slaughter factors that affect meat quality | 2.1 Identify impacts of production factors on meat quality 2.2 Explain pre-slaughter factors |
3. Identify processing factors that impact eating quality | 3.1 Explain pH/temperature window and how it impacts palatability 3.2 Describe role of electrical stimulation in controlling the rate of glycolysis in the carcase 3.3 Explain impact of stretching muscles pre-rigor on palatability 3.4 Describe process of ageing, its impact on tenderness and methods for extending the storage life of fresh meat including the application of packaging technologies 3.5 Describe impact of cooking on palatability of meat |
4. Describe quality attributes of meat | 4.1 Identify factors that control changes in colour of fresh meat 4.2 Describe development of marbling fat and its impact on palatability 4.3 Explain impact of drip on both the appearance and palatability of meat |
5. Identify and evaluate the MSA cuts based grading scheme | 5.1 Explain Palatability Analysis Critical Control Points (PACCP) approach to meat grading 5.2 Describe principles behind the development of the MSA carcase pathways system, including tasting protocols 5.3 Establish impact of various production, processing and value-adding inputs on the palatability of beef using the MSA model 5.4 Evaluate potential benefits of a cuts-based grading system to various industry sectors 5.5 Analyse alternative grading schemes and their various attributes |
6. Interpret and analyse data to predict probable impacts on meat eating quality | 6.1 Predict probable impacts of production and processing on meat quality 6.2 Identify potential solutions for eating quality problems |
Evidence must demonstrate the candidate's consistency of performance over time.
The candidate must apply meat science.
The candidate must:
explain the processing factors that impact on eating quality, including pH, electrical stimulation, ageing and stretching, to relevant personnel involved in the production process
apply relevant communication skills when explaining scientific principles simply and clearly
collate and analyse eating quality data
maintain currency of knowledge through independent research or professional development
identify and apply relevant workplace health and safety, regulatory and workplace requirements
identify and recommend improvements that could be made to improve meat eating quality to management
The candidate must demonstrate a broad factual, technical and theoretical knowledge of:
consumer taste testing protocols and how they have been used to set grade standards and develop the cuts-based grading system
factors that control changes in colour of fresh meat and other quality factors including drip and marbling which impact on both appearance and palatability
factors that occur between the knocking box and chiller assessment and their impact on meat palatability
visual and palatability attributes of meat quality that are important to customers
physical and chemical changes that occur when meat is cooked
anatomical and biochemical determinants of meat palatability
factors in animal husbandry, transport, lairage, slaughter, carcase storage, packaging, further processing and cooking that will impact on tenderness and palatability
minimum standards of enterprise performance as specified in relevant regulations
Competency must be demonstrated over time and under typical operating and production conditions for the enterprise.
Competency must be assessed in the workplace or under simulated conditions. Assessment is to occur under standard and authorised work practices, safety requirements and regulatory requirements.
A minimum of three different forms of assessment must be used.
Assessors must satisfy current standards for RTOs.