The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Assess options and select actions
|
|
Existing systems and procedures are assessed for compliance with fraud/corruption control plan and strategy, and broader organisational objectives. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Possible courses of action are determined based on an assessment of relevant resources and personnel available and integration with organisational activities. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Agreement of relevant staff and management is obtained on key features of the fraud/corruption control activities within their area of responsibility. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Resource implications and efficiency and effectiveness of options are assessed. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Desired outcomes are specified in consultation with stakeholders. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Preferred options are recommended to senior management and agreed to by those responsible for implementation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Set down procedures and expectations for staff
|
|
Key tasks and deadlines are specified and a project timeline is prepared when appropriate. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Ethical standards and guidelines are developed in consultation with stakeholders. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Procedures are developed outlining the obligations and protections relating to public interest disclosures, protected disclosures or whistleblowing legislation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Procedures are documented, tested and disseminated through most effective channels. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Opportunities for identifying possible new risks and threats are included in the procedures. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Refinements and adjustments to procedures are made on the basis of regular reviews and evaluation. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Implement performance evaluation and monitoring systems
|
|
Mechanisms to monitor implementation are identified through consultation with appropriate people. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Relevant information and methods of comparing progress of implementation procedures to objectives of fraud/corruption control plan are agreed between those involved. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Quality of work, extent of progress, resource usage and other critical features are assessed and variations or adjustments to the fraud/corruption control plan are recommended. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Authorities are kept informed of progress of implementation and of problems as they arise in accordance with organisational policy and procedures. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Regular reporting activities are used to provide advice regarding impact of procedures on effectiveness of fraud/corruption control strategy. Completed |
Evidence:
|