Formats and tools
- Unit Description
- Reconstruct the unit from the xml and display it as an HTML page.
- Assessment Tool
- an assessor resource that builds a framework for writing an assessment tool
- Assessment Template
- generate a spreadsheet for marking this unit in a classroom environment. Put student names in the top row and check them off as they demonstrate competenece for each of the unit's elements and performance criteria.
- Assessment Matrix
- a slightly different format than the assessment template. A spreadsheet with unit names, elements and performance criteria in separate columns. Put assessment names in column headings to track which performance criteria each one covers. Good for ensuring that you've covered every one of the performance criteria with your assessment instrument (all assessement tools together).
- Wiki Markup
- mark up the unit in a wiki markup codes, ready to copy and paste into a wiki page. The output will work in most wikis but is designed to work particularly well as a Wikiversity learning project.
- Evidence Guide
- create an evidence guide for workplace assessment and RPL applicants
- Competency Mapping Template
- Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners. A template for developing assessments for a unit, which will help you to create valid, fair and reliable assessments for the unit, ready to give to trainers and students
- Observation Checklist
- create an observation checklist for workplace assessment and RPL applicants. This is similar to the evidence guide above, but a little shorter and friendlier on your printer. You will also need to create a seperate Assessor Marking Guide for guidelines on gathering evidence and a list of key points for each activity observed using the unit's range statement, required skills and evidence required (see the unit's html page for details)
- Self Assessment Survey
- A form for students to assess thier current skill levels against each of the unit's performance criteria. Cut and paste into a web document or print and distribute in hard copy.
- Moodle Outcomes
- Create a csv file of the unit's performance criteria to import into a moodle course as outcomes, ready to associate with each of your assignments. Here's a quick 'how to' for importing these into moodle 2.x
- Registered Training Organisations
- Trying to find someone to train or assess you? This link lists all the RTOs that are currently registered to deliver UEENEEJ150A, 'Evaluate new and alternative technologies applicable to electrotechnology applications'.
- Google Links
- links to google searches, with filtering in place to maximise the usefulness of the returned results
- Books
- Reference books for 'Evaluate new and alternative technologies applicable to electrotechnology applications' on fishpond.com.au. This online store has a huge range of books, pretty reasonable prices, free delivery in Australia *and* they give a small commission to ntisthis.com for every purchase, so go nuts :)
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT | PERFORMANCE CRITERIA | ||
1 | Prepare to evaluate and report on alternative and new technologies | 1.1 | OHS procedures for a given work area are identified, identified, obtained and understood |
1.2 | Established OHS risk control measures and procedures are followed in preparation for the work. | ||
1.3 | The extent of evaluation is determined from proposed project specifications and discussion with appropriate personnel. | ||
1.4 | Advice is sought from the work supervisor to ensure the work is coordinated effectively with others. | ||
1.5 | Tools, testing devices, and manufacture's technical data needed to carry out the work are obtained and checked for correct operation and safety. | ||
2 | Evaluate alternative and new technologies. | 2.1 | OHS risk control measures and procedures for carrying out the work are followed. |
2.2 | In-depth knowledge of the electrotechnology discipline applicable to the alternative or new technology being considered is applied to the evaluation process. | ||
2.3 | Manufacture's technical data for alternative or new technologies is compared with proposed project specifications, budget and regulations. | ||
2.4 | Evaluation tests, where used, are set up in strict accordance with OHS requirements and established test methods for each particular component under scrutiny. | ||
2.5 | Evaluation is carried out methodically and results and comments systematically noted. | ||
2.6 | Unexpected situations are dealt with safely and with the approval of an authorised person. | ||
2.7 | Evaluation is carried out without damage to systems, circuits, the surrounding environment or services and using sustainable energy practices. | ||
3 | Report on use of alternative and new technologies | 3.1 | OHS work completion risk control measures and procedures are followed. |
3.2 | Where applicable, the work site is cleaned and made safe in accordance with established procedures. | ||
3.3 | Results of the evaluation are documented for use in design work including recommendations and justifications for adoption or rejection of the alternative and new technologies evaluated. | ||
3.4 | Report is forwarded to appropriate person(s) for endorsement. | ||