Formats and tools
- Unit Description
- Reconstruct the unit from the xml and display it as an HTML page.
- Assessment Tool
- an assessor resource that builds a framework for writing an assessment tool
- Assessment Template
- generate a spreadsheet for marking this unit in a classroom environment. Put student names in the top row and check them off as they demonstrate competenece for each of the unit's elements and performance criteria.
- Assessment Matrix
- a slightly different format than the assessment template. A spreadsheet with unit names, elements and performance criteria in separate columns. Put assessment names in column headings to track which performance criteria each one covers. Good for ensuring that you've covered every one of the performance criteria with your assessment instrument (all assessement tools together).
- Wiki Markup
- mark up the unit in a wiki markup codes, ready to copy and paste into a wiki page. The output will work in most wikis but is designed to work particularly well as a Wikiversity learning project.
- Evidence Guide
- create an evidence guide for workplace assessment and RPL applicants
- Competency Mapping Template
- Unit of Competency Mapping – Information for Teachers/Assessors – Information for Learners. A template for developing assessments for a unit, which will help you to create valid, fair and reliable assessments for the unit, ready to give to trainers and students
- Observation Checklist
- create an observation checklist for workplace assessment and RPL applicants. This is similar to the evidence guide above, but a little shorter and friendlier on your printer. You will also need to create a seperate Assessor Marking Guide for guidelines on gathering evidence and a list of key points for each activity observed using the unit's range statement, required skills and evidence required (see the unit's html page for details)
- Self Assessment Survey
- A form for students to assess thier current skill levels against each of the unit's performance criteria. Cut and paste into a web document or print and distribute in hard copy.
- Moodle Outcomes
- Create a csv file of the unit's performance criteria to import into a moodle course as outcomes, ready to associate with each of your assignments. Here's a quick 'how to' for importing these into moodle 2.x
- Registered Training Organisations
- Trying to find someone to train or assess you? This link lists all the RTOs that are currently registered to deliver PUAEMR001B, 'Establish context and develop risk evaluation criteria'.
- Google Links
- links to google searches, with filtering in place to maximise the usefulness of the returned results
- Books
- Reference books for 'Establish context and develop risk evaluation criteria' on fishpond.com.au. This online store has a huge range of books, pretty reasonable prices, free delivery in Australia *and* they give a small commission to ntisthis.com for every purchase, so go nuts :)
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT | PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
1. Identify issues by research and consultation | 1.1 Aim and objectives for the development of context are identified 1.2 Stakeholders' roles and inputs required are determined in accordance with policies and procedures 1.3 Budget, timeframe and schedule for research and consultation are determined 1.4 Community information is obtained |
2. Identify and liaise with stakeholders | 2.1 Existing and potential liaison networks are identified 2.2 Relevance of existing and potential networks is evaluated 2.3 New networks are developed using a range of strategies 2.4 Liaison and communication structures are established |
3. Clarify stakeholders' roles and requirements | 3.1 Stakeholders' roles and the need for their input are clearly defined and emphasised in seeking their cooperation 3.2 Stakeholders are informed of aims, objectives and the risk management context and structure within which they must operate 3.3 Needs of stakeholders are determined and conflicting needs identified and noted |
4. Develop risk evaluation criteria with stakeholders | 4.1 Social, environmental, financial and timeframe needs are identified in consultation with stakeholders 4.2 Legal, technical and political considerations are identified in consultation with stakeholders 4.3 Reasons for, and selection of, criteria are negotiated with stakeholders and agreed upon 4.4 Evaluation criteria are recommended which take into account practical constraints and the community's acceptance of risk 4.5 Community expectations of acceptable risk are established |
5. Monitor and review | 5.1 Context and Evaluation Criteria are monitored in accordance with standards and guidelines 5.2 Context and Evaluation Criteria are reviewed in accordance with standards and guidelines |